By the judgment no. 220/2021 the Court of Cassino upheld the objection of limitation raised by the defendant Company (that we assisted) and therefore rejected the claim for damages due to occupational disease (based on the alleged exposure to asbestos) brought iure hereditaria by the surviving spouse of the former employee.
Dismissal of an employee hired by a Bank. Disciplinary relevance of the employee’s conduct in the previous employment relationship. Use of evidence gathered in a different case.
A call-centre company filed an appeal pursuant to art. 28 Law no. 300/1970 against the decree no. 10438/2020 which rejected the appeal of a trade union organisation, excluding the existence of anti-union conduct of the company and the recognition of the office of RSU on the part of an employee militant in the applicant trade union.
It is unlawful to dismiss a public employee, sentenced for the offence of embezzlement, if he had already been sanctioned for the same facts with the disciplinary sanction of the suspension from work and remuneration.
By the judgment of 4 March 2020, the Court of Appeal of Bologna confirmed the judgment issued in first instance which rejected the claim for unfair competition made by a company against a former employee and the company that hired him after the termination of the employment relationship with the plaintiff. In particular, the plaintiff…