By decree of 2.9.2021, the Court of Pavia rejected the appeal pursuant to art. 28 Law no. 300/1970 filed by a trade union which did not signed the new Collective Bargaining Agreement and which complained to have been excluded from the meetings held by the Company only with the signatory trade unions. The negotiating table…
The Court of Bologna, with decree no. 3258 of May 18th, 2020 rejected the urgent appeal proposed by a multinational company against a former employee (manager) for breach of non-competition agreement. The Company complained the violation of the agreement by the former employee and requested the inhibitory of the continuation of the allegedly competing activity…
If the behavior is not existing it is not “anti-union behavior” The Court of Napoli, with decree no. 10438 of May 20th, 2020, rejected the appeal pursuant to art. 28 Stat. Lav. proposed by a trade union against a telecommunications company represented by our law Firm. The trade union complained an anti-union behavior by…
By the judgment of 4 March 2020, the Court of Appeal of Bologna confirmed the judgment issued in first instance which rejected the claim for unfair competition made by a company against a former employee and the company that hired him after the termination of the employment relationship with the plaintiff. In particular, the plaintiff…
A Trade Union organization filed an appeal pursuant to art. 28 Law no. 300/1970 against a Company, claiming that the conducts held towards an employee, appointed as the Company’s Trade Union representative (so called RSA), were prejudicial to the Trade Union organization activities. The alleged misconducts consisted in the removal of the employee from the…
Employment relationship – INPS Inspection minute
Working time – Labour Territorial Office’s injunction decree
È giustificato il licenziamento del dirigente, con mansione di Amministratore Delegato, per “semplice inadeguatezza del dirigente rispetto alla aspettative riconoscibili ex ante o [per] un’importante deviazione dalla linea segnata dalle direttive generali del datore di lavoro” e per “grave negligenza e incapacità nelle attività di amministratore delegato”. Così ha chiarito la Corte d’Appello di Milano…
Validità del patto di prolungamento del preavviso
La rilevanza disciplinare delle condotte extralavorative
